With OAuth credentials piling up, Microsoft teams can’t keep pace reviewing service accounts and app registrations. After owners leave, permissions don’t automatically disappear. For each non-human identity found in production automation, name an accountable owner and limit permissions to its job. Keep a record for auditors of changes that protect credentials.
Different jobs require different controls. This comparison uses vendors’ documented capabilities, not independent performance benchmarks, and doesn’t treat the products as interchangeable. Check your configured connectors to see what you can use from the modules you’ve purchased.
| Tool | Best suited to | Pros | Cons | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surf AI Non-Human Identity Hygiene | Coordinated identity cleanup |
|
|
Request quote |
| Microsoft Entra ID Governance | Native lifecycle governance |
|
Per-user with prerequisites; separate guest, workload, and agent considerations | |
| CyberArk Identity Security | Enterprise PAM |
|
|
Custom quote |
| BeyondTrust Password Safe | Credential and session control |
|
|
Custom quote |
| Delinea Platform | Hybrid PAM |
|
|
Quote-based modules |
| HashiCorp Vault | Application secrets |
|
|
Community edition; managed usage pricing; enterprise contract |
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud | Enterprise IGA |
|
|
Custom quote |
Why unmanaged app identities create risk
An app registration isn’t interchangeable with the record for its tenant-specific service principal. Your review needs the permission grants and credentials, along with an accountable application owner. Before removing a secret, check what uses it or risk stopping a scheduled integration.
Don’t delete an identity just because it’s inactive. Don’t automatically disable accounts with few sign-ins: monthly tasks or emergency workflows can depend on them, and each exception needs a named owner and review date.
How to compare non-human identity hygiene tools
Your Entra and Microsoft 365 comparison needs to cover Azure and SaaS too. Include on-premises Active Directory (AD) alongside your development systems. The Windows service account running a scheduled task can slip past a cloud-only inventory.
- Which managed identities and service principals are covered during discovery? Bots, AI agents, API keys and certificates need coverage.
- Don’t mistake identity governance and administration (IGA) for privileged access management (PAM). Owner reviews don’t replace credential rotation or the controls you still need for privileged sessions.
- Before fixing an account, name who’s accountable for it and show which permissions are unused or excessive. Irregular automation needs dependency checks.
- When you check connector prerequisites, confirm licensing units. Test approval controls and audit logging with a real application secret, including the consequences of disabling it.
How does recovery work?
Tools for Microsoft service accounts and app identities
Surf AI Non-Human Identity Hygiene
When ownership crosses teams, Surf.ai coordinates cleanup through specialized AI agents. Its Context Graph combines identity-provider data with HR status and the SaaS and infrastructure context it holds. That context is used to map each identity to the responsible person and classify dormant accounts once the original owner has left.
Surf describes its approach to non-human identity hygiene as owner-confirmed cleanup. People must reply in Slack or Teams before an account is suspended, deactivated, or kept as a logged exception.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Discovery and owner-confirmed cleanup |
| Identity coverage | Service accounts and credentials; test accounts; mailboxes |
| Microsoft relevance | Teams-based owner confirmation |
| Remediation safeguards | Human approval; exception handling; logged decisions |
| Deployment and pricing | Confirm hosting and commercial terms |
| Best fit | Cross-team operational cleanup |
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
Entra handles Microsoft-native lifecycle governance along with access certification. Matching or orphaned accounts show up through connected-app discovery, with newer agent governance making sponsors accountable.
Workloads need separate protection. Workload ID’s Conditional Access and risk controls cover supported service principals, with licensing per workload identity per month. To license members, you’ll need a qualifying Entra plan, with guest-governance billed by monthly active users. What’s supported depends on identity type.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Lifecycle and access governance |
| Key capabilities | Lifecycle Workflows; Entitlement Management; provisioning; Access Reviews; PIM |
| Microsoft coverage | Entra and Azure; Microsoft 365 |
| Non-human scope | Supported service principals and agent identities |
| Deployment and licensing | Cloud; layered user and identity licensing |
| Best fit | Microsoft-centered certification, not secrets vaulting |
CyberArk Identity Security
Alongside PAM and secrets protection, CyberArk provides controls for cloud entitlements and endpoints. After the Palo Alto Networks acquisition, its platform began switching to Idira branding in May 2026. Existing deployments continue to operate.
Which capabilities are included across the portfolio? Check the purchased modules and migration requirements against your Azure access policies and privileged AD administration.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Enterprise PAM and identity security |
| Protected identities | Administrators; service accounts; workloads; AI agents |
| Microsoft relevance | AD administration; Entra/Azure access; entitlement review |
| Safeguards | Vaulting; rotation; just-in-time access; recorded sessions |
| Deployment and pricing | SaaS/self-hosted/hybrid; custom quote |
| Best fit | Regulated or complex hybrid enterprises |
BeyondTrust Password Safe
Password Safe stores encrypted credentials, with privileged sessions supported too. BeyondTrust points out that static, over-permissioned non-human credentials keep turning up. Its product lets you automate discovery as well as rotation.
Directory connectivity and discovery in the Azure-hosted cloud edition require a Windows Resource Broker in your environment; without it, you can’t rotate credentials or proxy sessions.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Privileged credential and session management |
| Managed assets | Service/application credentials; SSH keys; RPA accounts |
| Microsoft relevance | AD/Entra integration; Azure discovery |
| Safeguards | Password/SSH-key rotation; approvals; credential injection; recorded sessions |
| Deployment and pricing | Cloud/on-premises/IaaS; custom quote |
| Best fit | Rotation and session accountability |
Delinea Platform
Delinea uses Secret Server for vaulting, adding dependency-aware rotation and browser-based privileged access. Check what depends on a credential shared by a Windows service and scheduled task.
Without a Distributed Engine, you can’t use some discovery and password-changing functions. Check its placement before testing rotation against hybrid AD.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Modular PAM |
| Key capabilities | Vaulting; continuous discovery; dependency-aware rotation; just-in-time access |
| Microsoft relevance | Entra authentication; hybrid AD; browser RDP; server privilege |
| Infrastructure dependency | Distributed Engine for selected rotation and integration functions |
| Deployment and pricing | Cloud-managed with hybrid reach; quote-based modules |
| Best fit | Hybrid service-account management |
HashiCorp Vault
As a secrets platform, Vault doesn’t serve as a complete IGA suite. Managed identities can authenticate through its Azure integration, which also creates or deletes service principals; dynamic credentials expire.
If an application can’t retrieve its replacement secret, rotation can still break it. Budget for specialist work on policies and high availability, including a failed-secret-retrieval test.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Secrets and encryption management |
| Key capabilities | Dynamic secrets; PKI; transit encryption; audit logging |
| Microsoft relevance | Azure/AD authentication; managed identities; SQL Server plugins |
| Governance limitation | Business ownership certification isn’t its primary function |
| Deployment and pricing | Community; self-managed Enterprise; usage-priced HCP Vault Dedicated |
| Best fit | Platform engineering and DevOps |
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint fits enterprise IGA when access certification spans Microsoft and other business applications. Its documented Agentic Fabric capabilities include machine-account discovery and Copilot Studio agent governance.
You’ll need to design policies, not just configure the connectors. You’ll need something else for credential checkout or privileged-session recording.
| Product snapshot | Details |
|---|---|
| Primary control model | Enterprise IGA |
| Governed identities | Human and machine identities; AI agents |
| Microsoft relevance | Entra connectivity; Azure DevOps; Copilot Studio |
| Safeguards | Lifecycle automation; ownership; certifications; separation of duties; risk analysis |
| Deployment and pricing | Cloud-native SaaS; custom quote |
| Best fit | Cross-application governance and recurring certification |
Choosing the right control model
Microsoft-native lifecycle controls call for Entra ID Governance. Compare CyberArk with BeyondTrust and Delinea for PAM, leaving Vault for when dynamic application credentials come first. SailPoint fits enterprise-wide certification, while Surf AI focuses on owner-confirmed cleanup.
Include ownerless app registrations and legacy service accounts in your proof of concept. Test your irregular automation. Confirm owners and access with evidence before testing credential protection and approval logging; deliberately undo a change, then record how long restoring it takes. Choose a control model with an auditable recovery procedure to address areas where your operations fall short.
About the author
Chris Porteous is the CEO of SearchEye, a company that offers a unique line of marketing services for clients and agencies across the globe. Prior to setting up his own company, he worked for prestigious financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs, UBS Securities and DBRS. He regularly shares his insights on business and finance on Entrepreneur, Forbes, Due and many other reputable websites.

